97 stories
·
2 followers

Apple to Resist Order in India to Preload State-Run App on iPhones

1 Comment

Aditya Kalra and Munsif Vengattil, reporting for Reuters:

Apple does not plan to comply with a mandate to preload its smartphones with a state-owned cyber safety app and will convey its concerns to New Delhi, three sources said, after the government’s move sparked surveillance concerns and a political uproar.

The Indian government has confidentially ordered companies including Apple, Samsung and Xiaomi to preload their phones with an app called Sanchar Saathi, or Communication Partner, within 90 days. The app is intended to track stolen phones, block them and prevent them from being misused.

The government also wants manufacturers to ensure that the app is not disabled. And for devices already in the supply chain, manufacturers should push the app to phones via software updates, Reuters was first to report on Monday. [...]

Apple however does not plan to comply with the directive and will tell the government it does not follow such mandates anywhere in the world as they raise a host of privacy and security issues for the company’s iOS ecosystem, said two of the industry sources who are familiar with Apple’s concerns. They declined to be named publicly as the company’s strategy is private.

The second source said Apple does not plan to go to court or take a public stand, but it will tell the government it cannot follow the order because of security vulnerabilities. Apple “can’t do this. Period,” the person said.

To my knowledge, there are no government-mandated apps pre-installed on iPhones anywhere in the world. I’m not even sure how that would work, technically, given that third-party apps have to come from the App Store and thus can’t be installed until after the iPhone is configured and the user signs into their App Store Apple Account.

The app order comes as Apple is locked in a court fight with an Indian watchdog over the nation’s antitrust penalty law. Apple has said it risks facing a fine of up to $38 billion in a case.

This is another one of those laws like the EU’s DMA, where maximum possible fines are based on a percentage of global revenue. No one in India seems to actually be threatening any such fine, but it’s ludicrous that it’s even possible.

Read the whole story
leonick
2 days ago
reply
"possible fines are based on a percentage of global revenue. ... but it’s ludicrous that it’s even possible." It's that or fines that billion to trillion dollar companies like Apple can just pay like a cost of doing business. Maybe 100% of regional revenue could work too, but I bet Gruber wouldn't like that either.
Sweden
Share this story
Delete

Nice Web Design Work From ‘In Common With’

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Toggle the “Light” switch here. It’s going to do what you hope it does. (Via Jason Fried.)

Read the whole story
leonick
22 days ago
reply
Except for the most expensive lamp, it was photographed on a different background and not with the light on. Also, thousands of dollars for a lamp?! I know the US has far too many billionaires but come on, even $545 (the cheapest) is absurd for a table lamp.
Sweden
Share this story
Delete

Google Reverses Course, Will Keep goo.gl Links Redirecting

1 Comment

Google:

While we previously announced discontinuing support for all goo.gl URLs after August 25, 2025, we’ve adjusted our approach in order to preserve actively used links. We understand these links are embedded in countless documents, videos, posts and more, and we appreciate the input received.

Nine months ago, we redirected URLs that showed no activity in late 2024 to a message specifying that the link would be deactivated in August, and these are the only links targeted to be deactivated. If you get a message that states, “This link will no longer work in the near future”, the link won’t work after August 25 and we recommend transitioning to another URL shortener if you haven’t already.

All other goo.gl links will be preserved and will continue to function as normal. To check if your link will be retained, visit the link today. If your link redirects you without a message, it will continue to work.

Nice!

Read the whole story
leonick
123 days ago
reply
Nice, sure, but if they keep goo.gl around why not keep all links? If it isn't commonly used it's a low or no cost link to maintain, no? Not enough tracking potential?
Sweden
Share this story
Delete

Microsoft claims 'Windows 11 24H2 is our most reliable version of Windows yet', which would be a welcome change

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Microsoft is awfully proud of its latest version of Windows, as it claims it's now less prone to failure. This would make for a pleasant change, as the first few months with the software were not great, to put it lightly.

As noted in the Microsoft blog, “We’re also proud to share that Windows 11 24H2 is our most reliable version of Windows yet. Compared to Windows 10 22H2, failure rates for unexpected restarts have dropped by 24%." The data was sourced from Reliability telemetry collected by Microsoft in July 2025.

It goes on to say, "These improvements reflect deep collaboration across engineering, design, and user research teams and a commitment to making Windows more resilient for everyone."

Ever since the 24H2 update launched in October of last year, it feels like we've been inundated with reports of issues. In October, 24H2 left an undeletable 8.63 GB update cache for some users. In that same month, some Western Digital SSD owners ran into constant blue screens. By December, the OS was reported to crash games due to Auto HDR, cause audio device problems, and lead to stuttering.

Then, in January, some Ubisoft games refused to play nice with 24H2. The temporary solution to this Ubisoft problem was blocking the Windows 11 update for PCs with Ubisoft games installed.

Windows 11

(Image credit: Microsoft)

Considering the software got rid of Cortana, WordPad, Steps Recorder, and was the recommended OS as Windows 10 end-of-life support was confirmed, I think it's fair to say 24H2 has left a bad taste in some users' mouths.

If 24H2, up until now, were a beta that users could sign up to, these problems would be more understandable, but this is the version of Windows you will get if you just leave auto update on. This meant that, throughout the last year, there were multiple times when updating could potentially cause you to receive a worse Windows experience.

On a more positive note, we haven't spotted any major problems with 24H2 in the last few months, though whether or not we think it's the 'most reliable version ever' will require a little more time with it.

As part of this, Microsoft officially announced the iconic blue screen would be changing, after reports indicating as much earlier this year. Microsoft claims its changes to the blue (now black) screen, including new quick machine recovery, "reduced the time users spend on the screen from 40 seconds to just 2 seconds for most consumer devices." Joining the latest build of Windows 11 will get you access to this and more.

We can only hope that, in time, 24H2 proves to be as stable as Microsoft claims.



Read the whole story
leonick
130 days ago
reply
Wish I could rely on it not to reboot over night without my permission, closing all apps and throwing away unsaved work. But I’m guessing not…
Sweden
Share this story
Delete

Clear as Mud

1 Comment

From the European Commission’s announcement today, “Commission closes investigation into Apple’s user choice obligations and issues preliminary findings on rules for alternative apps under the Digital Markets Act”:

Under the DMA, Apple is required to allow for the distribution of apps on its iOS operating system by means other than through the Apple App Store. In practical terms, this means that Apple should allow third party app stores on iOS and apps to be downloaded to the iPhone directly from the web.

The Commission takes the preliminary view that Apple failed to comply with this obligation in view of the conditions it imposes on app (and app store) developers. Developers wanting to use alternative app distribution channels on iOS are disincentivised from doing so as this requires them to opt for business terms which include a new fee (Apple’s Core Technology Fee). Apple also introduced overly strict eligibility requirements, hampering developers’ ability to distribute their apps through alternative channels. Finally, Apple makes it overly burdensome and confusing for end users to install apps when using such alternative app distribution channels.

So is the entire idea of the Core Technology Fee disallowed? Or is the fee too high? Does Apple need to just make app distribution free and unfettered, no fees, no restrictions?

Who knows? The fine is clear — €500M — but what exactly Apple did wrong and should change now is not.

Read the whole story
leonick
225 days ago
reply
More like clear as crystal. In response to having to allow distribution outside the app store they put in place rules and fees that are obviously designed to disincentivise this. They shouldn't have done that or been less obvious about it. There are no complaints about the $99 developer program fee. The issue is obviously that the new rules and fees are intentionally overly complicated.
Sweden
Share this story
Delete

AltStore PAL Is Free of Charge, Thanks to ‘MegaGrant’ From Epic Games

1 Comment

Apple, in its media statement re: Hot Tub (the you-have-to-admit-it’s-a-fun-name hardcore porn app now available in the AltStore PAL alternative app marketplace in the EU), closed its statement with the following: “The truth is that we are required by the European Commission to allow it to be distributed by marketplace operators like AltStore and Epic who may not share our concerns for user safety.”

On X, Epic CEO Tim Sweeney wrote:

Contrary to Apple’s false statement, the Epic Games Store doesn’t carry this app, doesn’t carry any porn apps, and has never carried porn apps.

Epic Games does run an alternative app marketplace for iOS in the EU, and Sweeney is correct that neither Hot Tub, nor any other porno apps, are in it. But what Apple is alluding to here is Epic’s financial backing of AltStore by way of an “Epic MegaGrant”. AltStore announced the grant back in August:

GOOD NEWS EU 🇪🇺 For innovation in app distribution, Epic Games has granted us a MegaGrant grant that we plan to use to cover Apple’s Core Technology Fee going forward — and we won’t take it for granted!

What does this mean? AltStore PAL is now FREE — no subscription necessary 🎉

Prior to the grant, AltStore PAL charged €1.50 per installation to cover Apple’s Core Technology Fee, the rules for which have gotten more complicated since originally announced, but for app marketplaces themselves (like AltStore PAL) costs €0.50 per-user per-first-installation per-year. After the grant from Epic, AltStore PAL became a free download.

Is it fair for Apple to lay AltStore PAL’s content decisions at Epic’s feet? I’d say it’s more fair than describing Hot Tub as “approved” by Apple for having been notarized.

Read the whole story
leonick
302 days ago
reply
If you can say Epic is distributing porn because they pay cover the Core Technology Fee... Then we can say Apple is now distributing porn, they're even making money from it.
Sweden
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories